I’ve chosen this article for a number of reasons.  First, I like the recommended reading list.  I think it augments the one mentioned that West Point put out, not beats it as suggested in some articles.  I like that it focused on Irregular Warfare topics as that is very topical today and also shows that the US has a long association with this type of fighting. While the classics should be studied, I see nothing wrong with branching out for other viewpoints.  Again, I think Arguilla’s list is a nice compliment to the classical one put out by West Point.  I also like that this list for its brevity.  Too often, the Services, educational institutions, and/or various GOs put out lists that would take a lifetime to read.  In today’s world … Read entire article »